<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Food and Wine Daily &#187; Organics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foodandwinedaily.com/category/the-politics-of-food/organics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foodandwinedaily.com</link>
	<description>Everything that is fit to consume on the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:29:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Organics better. Official!</title>
		<link>http://foodandwinedaily.com/2008/04/01/organics-better-official/</link>
		<comments>http://foodandwinedaily.com/2008/04/01/organics-better-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>edcharles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The politics of food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micronutrient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytonutrient]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodandwinedaily.com/2008/04/01/organics-better-official/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organic food really is better for you. As Grist reports, a study by The Organic Center makes fascinating reading: &#8220;The authors show that before 2000, very few peer-reviewed studies compared organic and conventional food; the ones that did looked only at &#8220;macronutrients&#8221; &#8212; vitamins and minerals. In that era, there was little consistent evidence pointing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organic food really is better for you. As <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/3/27/95332/6053?source=food">Grist reports</a>, a study by The Organic Center makes fascinating reading: &#8220;The authors show that before 2000, very few peer-reviewed studies compared organic and conventional food; the ones that did looked only at &#8220;macronutrients&#8221; &#8212; vitamins and minerals. In that era, there was little consistent evidence pointing to an organic advantage. Things have changed since. We&#8217;re learning that macronutrients only tell part of the story. Evidence is building that micronutrients &#8212; antioxidants, phytonutrients, etc. &#8212; play a serious role in human nutrition.&#8221;</p>
<p>As the Organic Centre, <a href="http://www.organic-center.org/science.nutri.php?action=view&amp;report_id=126">where you can download the report</a>, says :</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This is the first major, indepth review of the published scientific literature on the nutritional benefits of organic food completed since 2003.</p>
<p>Over 40 new studies have come out since the last review was carried out &#8212; studies that dramatically improve our ability to answer a basic question &#8212; are organic foods generally more nutritious than conventional foods?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://foodandwinedaily.com/2008/04/01/organics-better-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.344 seconds -->
